URL: http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1957692,00.html

"Scientists say the global energy crisis can be solved by using the desert sun"

I've been wondering for a long time why the open deserts in north Africa isn't used for solar energy. There's 3 times as much sun there as there is in Europe. Unlike wind power plants in Europe, there's plenty of space for solar energy mirrors on the vast stretches of the north African desert.

This Guardian article is really interesting for me. Here are some interesting facts:

"[the two German scientists] calculate that covering just 0.5% of the world's hot deserts with a technology called concentrated solar power (CSP) would provide the world's entire electricity needs"

"Together the region could provide all its electricity needs by 2050 with barely any fossil fuels and no nuclear power. This would allow a 70% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from electricity production over the period."

The article also sheds some light on the comparison of fusion reactors compared to solar power.

"The outlook is not promising. More than 30 countries last week agreed to spend £7bn on an experimental fusion reactor in France which critics say will not produce any electricity for 50 years, if at all."

Comments

Your email will never ever be published.

Previous:
MUnderscorePatch - tired of typing manage_main? November 29, 2006 Zope
Next:
is is not the same as equal in Python December 1, 2006 Python
Related by category:
What does $456 billion buy? May 7, 2007 Politics
Founder of Islamic TV station accused of beheading wife February 17, 2009 Politics
Haiti Earthquake: Who's given what? February 2, 2010 Politics
American foreign policy May 25, 2007 Politics
Related by keyword:
Difference between Sweden and UK: renewable energy June 13, 2008 Sweden
World Oil Depletion and the Inevitable Crisis July 27, 2004 Politics